After pointlessly preventing tooth and nail for nearly two years, FTC will now be compelled to finish the case,
after the newest setback at The USA Courtroom of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit). The Ninth Circuit’s nicely anticipated en banc denial, following a sequence of upsets, put the dying nail within the coffin. After the direct, clear, and really quick seven-line opinion, I’m sure that FTC is not going to even think about knocking on the doorways of the US Supreme Courtroom.

This determination clears all of the clouds hovering round Qualcomm–the nation’s 5G crown jewel. This may
even have a long-lasting influence not solely on its licensing enterprise and insurance policies but in addition on the know-how
{industry} and improvements as a complete.

Facet notice: If you want to know the complete background of the case, observe this FTC vs. Qualcomm article series.

A wave of setbacks for the FTC

After some preliminary success at the US District Courtroom for the Northern District of California (US
District Courtroom), FTC has always seen setbacks, and at occasions, very harsh rebukes on the Ninth Circuit.

First, the three-judge panel unanimously accepted Qualcomm’s request for the keep, with a ruling that
nearly ridiculed the US District Courtroom’s determination. The panel opined it as “…a trailblazing software of
the antitrust legal guidelines or … an improper tour past the outer limits of the Sherman Act…”

Second, when one other three-judge appeals panel heard the case, its questioning and doubting FTC’s
complicated arguments made it amply clear which means the panel was leaning.

Third, the precise unanimous judgment nearly shredded the US District Courtroom’s determination and fully
reversed it, together with the preliminary abstract judgment. The opinion written by Decide Callahan was a tell-a-
story of how US District Courtroom Decide, Lucy Koh miss-applied the antitrust legal guidelines.

Lastly, this healthful denial of the en banc request was one more sturdy strike towards FTC’s
unfounded fascination in persevering with the unworthy prosecution of a free and really profitable American
enterprise. It certainly quashed the hopes of some who thought the shock transfer of FTC Chairman
Joseph J. Simons, a Trump appointee, to authorize the en banc request had introduced life again into the
case.

Looking back, the case has gone via a complete slew of US Federal judges—six judges of the panels, to
some extent the complete Ninth Circuit bench of greater than 25 judges. However the one sympathizer for FTC, from
the US authorized system, appears to be Decide Lucy Koh of the US District Courtroom. As an observer who attended
nearly all of the court docket hearings, I discovered her dealing with of the case to be weird. Among the examples of her unusual habits embody: artificially limiting the invention interval which skewed the case, clinging on to
the hypotheses corresponding to “tax on the competitor,” which had been rejected by different courts and judges,
rejecting the testimonies of all of Qualcomm’s executives, together with that of its extremely revered and
revered founder, and an {industry} veteran, Dr. Irwin Jacobs.

A sequence of unlucky occasions

As I’ve indicated many occasions in my earlier articles, this case had a variety of oddities proper from the
starting and so they continued all through the proceedings. The case was filed within the final days of the
earlier administration, with solely partial fee current. The sitting FTC commissioner publicly
criticized the case by writing a harsh rebuke on The Wall Street Journal. When the complete fee was
constituted, the Chairman recused from the case, making the choice a tie with two commissioners
supporting and the opposite two opposing. That made the case nearly run on autopilot, managed by the
FTC workers. Apple, which was one of many alleged instigators and a serious witness within the case, settled with
Qualcomm and ended its lively assist.

Many U.S. Authorities businesses opposed FTC’s motion. The U.S. Division of Protection, which shares the
accountability and companions with FTC on antitrust issues, vehemently opposed the case and even took
the unprecedented step of testifying towards it on the appeals listening to. Many authorized students and former
FTC commissioners, retired Ninth Circuit judges, opined towards the case.

What’s subsequent?

Though FTC has a theoretical choice of knocking on the door of the US Supreme Courtroom, I don’t assume
these sequence of setbacks and powerful rebukes depart it any choice apart from to shut the case and transfer
on. If the appeals determination was not unanimous, not an entire reversal, or the en banc was accepted,
there was some justification. With none of these, it might be completely silly for FTC to proceed the
case and waste much more taxpayer cash.

If they’d any doubts, the Ninth Circuit’s en banc unambiguous opinion, which is mere seven traces lengthy
makes it fairly clear. That’s the shortest court docket doc that I’ve ever seen and analyzed. Many go
as much as 100 pages or extra.

This determination for positive clears all of the doubts round Qualcomm’s licensing insurance policies and the industry-
customary apply of licensing to OEMs. Meaning the apply of calculating licensing charges primarily based on
the value of the machine (with caps, in fact) is totally legitimate and authorized.
The case establishes a fairly important priority for licensing practices and applicability of antitrust
legal guidelines. It’ll have a long-lasting influence on not solely the mobile however nearly your complete know-how {industry}
and past. With 5G set to remodel nearly each {industry} on the planet, the repercussions of the case
are inconceivable to overstate. Search for an in depth article on this from me quickly.

In the meantime, for extra articles like this, and up-to-date evaluation of the newest cellular and tech {industry}
information, sign-up for our month-to-month e-newsletter at TantraAnalyst.com/Newsletter, or hearken to our Tantra’s
Mantra podcast.