Tesla is suing a Chinese language media group over an article that described Tesla having severe high quality points and poor working situations at Gigafactory Shanghai.

The article

Pingwest, a Chinese language publication that describes itself as “the story of China’s tech evolution, past the headlines,” revealed a damning article on Tesla final month titled “Giga-Sweatshop Meets Corporate Overlords: an Exclusive Look Into How Tesla China Runs its Shanghai Gigafactory 3.”

The article contains wide-ranging claims of high quality issues at Tesla’s manufacturing unit in addition to dangerous working situations and even questionable gross sales ways.

A lot of the claims are based mostly on single unnamed sources that Pingwest says work at Tesla or Tesla suppliers.

The claims differ from easy complaints concerning the meals served on the manufacturing unit:

Again in his final gig, Liu recollects, superiors would deliver employees snacks and say good issues like “everyone did an excellent job at present” to them, whereas senior engineers would even prepare dinner dumplings and share them with juniors. Tesla’s Shanghai manufacturing unit doesn’t have dumplings. It doesn’t even have snacks made obtainable to employees. There was, nonetheless, further boxed meals for workers who work shifts after 8:30PM, which quickly downgraded to immediate noodle, and finally packaged bread that was simple to retailer. A lot of whom used to the cuisines worldwide whereas working for different foreign-owned factories discovered themselves affected by gastro reflux brought on by chain-eating immediate noodle, and their requests for extra staple meals reminiscent of steam bread declined, and even receiving expired packaged bread.

To extra severe allegations of knowingly utilizing faulty elements:

The existence of those elements in Tesla’s provide chain might also have been the results of pace strain. “We merely can’t make sufficient elements that meet high quality customary. It’s hectic,” mentioned a consultant of a Tesla provider who needs to not be named, “the answer has been simple: simply take the faulty elements, and ship them to Tesla.”

The article additionally immediately names Tesla government Tom Zhu (Zhu Xiaotong) and alleges that he typically insults workers and doesn’t enable workers to earn a living from home regardless of firm coverage.

Tesla fights again

Tesla, and CEO Elon Musk particularly, have been recognized to struggle again towards media, however in a uncommon transfer, the automaker is definitely taking Pingwest to court docket over the article.

The Global Times studies:

In accordance with a press release issued on Sunday by the Beijing PingWest Work together Expertise Co, the corporate acquired the indictment, a discover of responding to prosecution, in addition to different affidavit from Tesla. The supplies had been despatched by the Shanghai Pudong New Space Individuals’s Court docket. PingWest is required to submit related counter evidences, if any, earlier than February 8.

Tesla reportedly didn’t reply to Pingwest’s unique request for remark and a response to the claims hasn’t been made public as a part of the lawsuit.

Electrek‘s take

It’s uncommon for a serious firm like Tesla to resolve to take a media firm to court docket like that.

The automaker has been recognized to struggle towards unfavorable media studies. For instance, there was the well-known case of the New York Occasions article following the launch of the Mannequin S.

However it’s not unprecedented for Tesla to really sue media.

Some may bear in mind Tesla suing Prime Gear for staging the Roadster working out of battery and Tesla ended up shedding in court docket as a result of the present was thought-about to solely be “leisure.”

That was a decade in the past although, and now Tesla is a a lot completely different firm.

It’s stunning to me that they’d take this path to struggle that media report, however I’m not accustomed to Chinese language legal guidelines and it would really make sense on this case. I don’t know.

As for the credibility of the report, they appear to be effectively knowledgeable. After they speak concerning the administration in China and the strange suspension recall, they appear to have correct data and sources.

Nevertheless, on among the extra damning claims, they most frequently solely use one unnamed supply for every, which is much more questionable.

I don’t know if we’re going to have the ability to comply with the lawsuit like we are able to with US lawsuits, but it surely could possibly be attention-grabbing.

As ordinary, Tesla followers will merely toss this complete factor as simply the forces at play making an attempt to forged FUD (worry, uncertainty, and doubt) on the automaker, whereas the Tesla shorts will declare that the automaker is making an attempt to bury its wrongdoings.

For my part, the reality most definitely lies within the center.

FTC: We use revenue incomes auto affiliate hyperlinks. More.

Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.